

If you’ve spent any time scrolling LinkedIn, you’ve probably seen images like the one above. Two people standing in dramatic lighting, charts floating in mid-air, a split cityscape behind them, and a lone figure contemplating his life choices at a three-way intersection.
And the wild part?
None of it means anything.
This is the visual equivalent of corporate buzzword soup. A random collection of objects tossed together because the AI thinks “business topic, therefore charts, skyline, road metaphor, executive in a suit… boom, masterpiece.”
Except it’s not.
It’s noise dressed up as insight.
When AI is left to its own instincts, it pulls from tropes. It doesn’t understand context. It doesn’t understand narrative. It doesn’t understand the difference between:
So you get these pseudo-complex images packed with symbols that don’t support the story. Charts. Pie graphs. Graphs on top of pie graphs. A city skyline because cities mean “growth”, right? A crossroads because decisions. Two people on opposite sides because… duality?
It’s a juvenile attempt at visual communication.
It’s the design version of someone trying to sound smart by using long words they don’t understand.

There is an old saying: “I would have written a shorter letter, but I didn’t have the time.”
That’s the heart of it.
Simplicity is not easy.
Clarity is not lazy.
Minimalism requires intention.
Human designers sweat over what to remove, not what to add. They ask:
AI, when used passively, does none of that. It adds because adding seems safer. It piles on visual clichés instead of committing to a clear concept.
Sophistication requires critical thinking.
AI requires guidance.
We love AI at Hyperweb. We use it everywhere. But we also treat it like a junior designer:
Talented? Yes.
Fast? Absolutely.
Capable of brilliance? Often.
Capable of nonsense? Constantly.
The magic happens only when a human steps in with intention and constraints.
The best outputs come when you don’t let AI guess what you want, but instead tell it what matters, what doesn’t, what the narrative is, and what emotion you’re trying to evoke.
Left on autopilot, AI will always lean on stereotypes, because stereotypes are easy.
Critical thinking is not.

Because your visuals are not decoration. They are strategy.
They signal:
Sloppy visuals make your brand look sloppy.
Generic visuals make your brand look generic.
Lazy AI outputs make your brand look lazy.
If you wouldn’t accept “Lorem ipsum” in your web copy, why accept generic clip-art-level imagery in your content?
If you want AI to produce sophisticated work, you need to give it sophisticated direction.
That means:
AI can create almost anything, but the “why” still has to come from you.
Without that?
You get an image like the one above.
Charts floating in space.
People staring into the void.
A city split down the middle like a marketing divorce settlement.
All style.
No substance.
Sophisticated visual communication will always require:
AI is not a shortcut around that. It’s a multiplier of whatever you bring to it.
If you bring intention, you get brilliance.
If you bring nothing, you get meaningless mashups of charts and cityscapes.
And the brands who figure that out first will look like the grown-ups in the room while everyone else keeps posting glorified clip art.
<– Check out this photo of Carl. That’s carl when he was doing Ironman races. Trust me – he doesn’t look like that anymore. 🙂 But he’s still opinionated as ever. Hopefully, you liked his writing.